Federation CJA intelligence workspace
Grant Analyst
Select an agency to see a committee-ready summary of its allocation request. Every flag and claim links to the document excerpt or data field it came from.
2026 allocation cycle
Executive summary
Maple Grove Youth Collective requests $265,000, up 35.2% from $196,000. Last year every reported outcome declined against prior year. 0 of 3 reported measures met or exceeded target. 4 items flagged for review.
After-school mentoring and drop-in programming for ages 11-17 across three sites in the north district.
This tool does not score applicants or recommend approval or decline. Funding decisions are made by staff and the allocations committee.
Key figures
- Requested this cycle
- $265,000
- Prior year request / award
- $196,000 / $196,000
- Change in request
- +35.2% (+$69,000)
- Total budget change
- +35.0% ($305,185 → $412,000)
- Outcome trend vs. last year
- Declining
- Measures meeting target
- 0 of 3 reported
| Reported outcome | 2025 | Target | 2024 | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Youth enrolled | 384 | 450 | 441 | |
| Average weekly attendance | 172 | 240 | 205 | |
| Mentor matches sustained 6+ months | 48 | 75 | 66 |
Risk flags
Funding request up +35.2%
The request rises from $196,000 to $265,000, an increase of $69,000.
Total budget up +35.0%
Total operating budget moves from $305,185 to $412,000.
Administration growing faster than the budget overall
Administration rises +50.0% against a total budget change of +35.0%.
All reported outcomes declined year over year
Youth enrolled: 384 (prior 441); Average weekly attendance: 172 (prior 205); Mentor matches sustained 6+ months: 48 (prior 66).
Strengths
Three established sites with a stated retention and supervision fix already in effect since September 2025.
Mentor matching remains the core of the model, with 48 matches sustained beyond six months in a disrupted year.
Concerns
The request rises 35.2% while all three reported outcome measures fell against both target and prior year.
Administration grows 50% year over year, faster than program staffing.
A fourth site is proposed in the same year that attendance at existing sites declined by 16%.
Questions for the agency
What enrolment and attendance recovery does the agency project for 2026 at the three existing sites before the fourth site opens?
What drives the $9,000 increase in administration, and is any of it one-time?
Has the September 2025 supervision model shown measurable effects in the first two quarters?
Source documents
Click any source reference on the left to open the underlying excerpt here.