Federation CJA intelligence workspace
Three workflows, demonstrated on fictional data
Each workflow shows its source information beside the generated output, so you can see where every conclusion came from. Nothing here connects to a live system.
Workflow 01
Grant Analyst
Turns an agency's allocation request, budget, and impact report into a committee-ready summary with risk flags, each linked to the exact source excerpt.
Try demoWorkflow 02
Donor Briefing
Assembles a one-screen meeting briefing from a donor's giving, event, volunteer, and meeting records, citing the record behind every point.
Try demoWorkflow 03
Shared Inbox Triage
Categorizes a shared inbox in one pass with urgency, department, and an editable draft reply that a staff member approves before anything is sent.
Try demoGrant review workload — illustrative
An arithmetic illustration of current review effort, using assumed figures. These are assumptions for discussion, not measurements, and this demo makes no claim about time saved or return on investment.
- Agencies reviewed per cycle
- 75
- Assumed staff hours per agency
- 2 hours
- Review hours per cycle
- 150 hours
- Assumed loaded hourly cost
- $50
- Review cost per cycle
- $7,500
75 agencies × 2 hours = 150 hours. 150 hours × $50 = $7,500 per cycle. Both inputs are illustrative assumptions supplied for the demonstration.
Other opportunities
Concepts for discussion only. These are not built and there is nothing to click.
Crisis knowledge search — concept only
Ask across policies, service directories, and past crisis communications in one place.
Board package preparation — concept only
Assemble recurring board materials from existing reports and minutes.
Event Q&A — concept only
Answer routine attendee questions about a specific event from its own materials.
The Grant Analyst never scores an applicant or recommends approval or decline. Staff and the allocations committee make funding decisions. Use "Reset demo" in the header to return every screen to its starting state before presenting again.